单击此处以阅读完整的文章以阅读完整的文章。护理，并有资格在较老的医疗保险受益人中。
摘要来源：
j操纵性生理学。 2021 10; 44（8）：663-673。 EPUB 2022 3月26日。PMID： 35351337> 35351337 Bezdjian，Eric L Hurwitz，Andrew W J Toler，Daniel Rossi，Sarah Uptmor，Kayla Sagester，Kayla Sagester，Maria Bangash，Todd A Mackenzie，John D Lurie，Ian Coulter，Scott Haldeman，Scott Haldeman，Scott Haldeman，James M Whedon class =“ sub_abstract_label”>目标： 本研究的目的是比较患者对SP的使用的观点inal manipulative therapy (SMT) compared to prescription drug therapy (PDT) with regard to health-related quality of life (HRQoL), patient beliefs, and satisfaction with treatment.
METHODS: Four cohorts of Medicare beneficiaries were assembled according to previous treatment received as evidenced in claims data: SMT，PDT和2个跨界人群（参与者都经历了两种治疗方法）。共有195名Medicare受益人对调查做出了回应。 Outcome measures used were a 0-to-10 numeric rating scale to measure satisfaction, the Low Back Pain Treatment Beliefs Questionnaire to measure patient beliefs, and the 12-item Short Form Health Survey to measure HRQoL.
RESULTS: Recipients of SMT were more likely to be very satisfied with their care (84%) than recipients of PDT （50％; p = .002）。 SMT队列自我报告的HRQOL比较明显更高到PDT队列；在12项短表健康调查中，身心健康得分的平均差异分别为12.85和9.92。与PDT队列相比，SMT队列对脊骨疗法护理对脊椎治疗的关注程度较低（p = .03）。
结论：结论： 在较旧的后疼痛中，较高的较高的次要率是在较高的低位率的情况下，越来越多的率率是较高的频率，越来越多的率是在较高的parterial率的范围。与PDT的长期接受者相比，他们对护理方式的满意度更高。对护理长期管理的参与者更有可能对他们接受的护理方式具有积极的态度和信念。